歐洲法院前日（周二）作出重要裁決，裁定德國政府有權拒絕向從未在當地工作過的歐盟新移民，發放福利津貼。...
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20141113/18933200
Save Hong Kong from China
(from 麥兜噹噹伴我心)
Thursday, 13 November 2014
德開歐盟先例 拒向新移民派福利
很法西斯，左膠快來譴責...
Friday, 31 October 2014
BBC accused of inaccurate report claiming HK protestors received training
The BBC is accused of an inaccurate report which claimed the protestors in Hong Kong received training by participants of Oslo Freedom Forum:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-29708917
https://www.change.org/p/the-bbc-should-immediately-withdraw-its-inaccurate-report-titled-hong-kong-protests-activists-share-secrets-at-oslo-freedom-forum-oct-21
The Western media haven't got a clue what is happening in Hong Kong. Let me offer some help...
The Occupy Central with Love and Peace (OCLP), which Benny Tai is one of the three mainly responsible, has no control over the current occupation in HK, since the beginning and at any point throughout. The occupation was started as a spontaneous and self-organized reaction to the police's use of teargas against student protests on Sept 28. The current occupation is not in any shape or form close to what OCLP organizers had in mind (more on this below), and many occupiers are not supporters of any organizations who claim to be leading or organizing this, OCLP included. Hence while it might be true that OCLP or whoever might have received training or trained some would-be participants, it is indeed untrue to claim that the current protestors (who are mainly student supporters, not OCLP supporters) are trained.
The Western media take the simplistic view that there are the pro-Beijing forces, and there are the pro-democracy parties, in HK. What you do not know is that people in HK are getting increasingly frustrated by the "mainstream" pro-democracy political parties and organisations, of which OCLP is one. For the last 30 years these mainstream parties controlled and dominated how the pro-democracy camp think and act. Most importantly they hold a "moderate" view and emphasize peaceful actions and even "love", against a brutal dictatorial regime (China). Their protests are in name only; they never really wanted their protests to have any real effect, for any revolutionary change may actually jeopardize their own established status. What they want is the occupation of moral high ground without having to make any real sacrifice.
Going back to OCLP, their initial plan was for protestors to simply sit down and wait for the police to arrest them, and they would not resist arrest or defend themselves when the police do so. In fact they did give ridiculous "training" to would-be participants on "how to behave peacefully and do not resist arrest" (yes, you read it correctly). They have been talking about this occupation since early 2013 but have avoided and postponed doing it as much as they could. In fact, if not for that fact that the students (Joshua Wong and co.) broke into a government-barricaded public square outside the government HQ on Sept 26 (a "violent" action that OCLP no doubt would not have approved of, had they knew it in advance), none of this would have happened - we would still be "talking" about occupying Central. In fact Central is still never occupied (the occupied areas are Admiralty, Mong Kok and Causeway Bay.) And once it started, the OCLP has tried to persuade the occupiers to disband on numerous occasions (almost on a daily basis). That's why the current occupiers would not listen to OCLP.
I think the BBC may be a bit bemused by their (OCLP's) reaction to the report; the BBC might think they are praising them when their report claimed that they are trained by those in the Oslo Forum. But OCLP and their kind of "moderate", mainstream parties are enslaved by the idea of "it is wrong to organize a revolution and overthrow the government", and "it is even more wrong to have foreign involvement in such activities". They have been actively denying that this is the "Umbrella Revolution", and renamed it as "Umbrella Movement". This is another reason why the more "aggressive" pro-democracy protestors despise the OCLP and the like.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-29708917
https://www.change.org/p/the-bbc-should-immediately-withdraw-its-inaccurate-report-titled-hong-kong-protests-activists-share-secrets-at-oslo-freedom-forum-oct-21
The Western media haven't got a clue what is happening in Hong Kong. Let me offer some help...
The Occupy Central with Love and Peace (OCLP), which Benny Tai is one of the three mainly responsible, has no control over the current occupation in HK, since the beginning and at any point throughout. The occupation was started as a spontaneous and self-organized reaction to the police's use of teargas against student protests on Sept 28. The current occupation is not in any shape or form close to what OCLP organizers had in mind (more on this below), and many occupiers are not supporters of any organizations who claim to be leading or organizing this, OCLP included. Hence while it might be true that OCLP or whoever might have received training or trained some would-be participants, it is indeed untrue to claim that the current protestors (who are mainly student supporters, not OCLP supporters) are trained.
The Western media take the simplistic view that there are the pro-Beijing forces, and there are the pro-democracy parties, in HK. What you do not know is that people in HK are getting increasingly frustrated by the "mainstream" pro-democracy political parties and organisations, of which OCLP is one. For the last 30 years these mainstream parties controlled and dominated how the pro-democracy camp think and act. Most importantly they hold a "moderate" view and emphasize peaceful actions and even "love", against a brutal dictatorial regime (China). Their protests are in name only; they never really wanted their protests to have any real effect, for any revolutionary change may actually jeopardize their own established status. What they want is the occupation of moral high ground without having to make any real sacrifice.
Going back to OCLP, their initial plan was for protestors to simply sit down and wait for the police to arrest them, and they would not resist arrest or defend themselves when the police do so. In fact they did give ridiculous "training" to would-be participants on "how to behave peacefully and do not resist arrest" (yes, you read it correctly). They have been talking about this occupation since early 2013 but have avoided and postponed doing it as much as they could. In fact, if not for that fact that the students (Joshua Wong and co.) broke into a government-barricaded public square outside the government HQ on Sept 26 (a "violent" action that OCLP no doubt would not have approved of, had they knew it in advance), none of this would have happened - we would still be "talking" about occupying Central. In fact Central is still never occupied (the occupied areas are Admiralty, Mong Kok and Causeway Bay.) And once it started, the OCLP has tried to persuade the occupiers to disband on numerous occasions (almost on a daily basis). That's why the current occupiers would not listen to OCLP.
I think the BBC may be a bit bemused by their (OCLP's) reaction to the report; the BBC might think they are praising them when their report claimed that they are trained by those in the Oslo Forum. But OCLP and their kind of "moderate", mainstream parties are enslaved by the idea of "it is wrong to organize a revolution and overthrow the government", and "it is even more wrong to have foreign involvement in such activities". They have been actively denying that this is the "Umbrella Revolution", and renamed it as "Umbrella Movement". This is another reason why the more "aggressive" pro-democracy protestors despise the OCLP and the like.
Wednesday, 1 October 2014
Juliana Liu again - this time as a colonization foot soldier herself
Ah, Ms Juliana Liu again. No wonder she fiercely criticizes HK people's actions against mainland immigrants and "seung fei" (*) pregnant women. Because she herself is one! Congratulations Ms Liu, your baby will be a HK citizen in a month's time.
Some criticisms against her (in Chinese)
https://www.facebook.com/europechinese/photos/a.566872090026410.1073741827.558794540834165/763647857015498/?type=1
(*) "seung fei", which literally means "double-non", is the term given to those babies born in HK but where neither parent is a HK permanent resident. Somehow the laws here grant all such babies HK permanent residency. As a result countless mainland Chinese women cross the border and give birth to such babies, thereby enjoying the rights to education etc without paying any tax (along with numerous associated problems like taking up all spaces in hospitals, schools) and eventually acquiring permanent residency for the parents themselves as well. One of the main ways of population dilution, a key part of the Chinese colonization strategy.
Thursday, 28 August 2014
What do the Russian invasion and HK's 689 have in common
Ukraine crisis: Nato images 'show Russia troops'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-28972878
Separatist leader Alexander Zakharchenko earlier told Russian TV that 3-4,000 Russian citizens were fighting in their ranks.
He said many of the Russians were former service-people or current service personnel on leave, insisting that all were volunteers.
梁振英也是「個人名義」、靠「休假中」「已退休」警犬，邪惡勢力連藉口也一樣...
Wednesday, 27 August 2014
Rotherham child abuse: fear of being labelled racist
All thanks to the leftists who over the years have "educated" the public into such fear... not to mention them turning the country into a budding bed for Islamic terrorists. As I always say, you leftists have blood on your hands...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28947707
update:
陳雲 fb：
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28947707
The majority of those behind the abuse were described as Asian, while the majority of the reported victims were young white girls. The inquiry team noted fears among council staff of being labelled "racist" if they focused on victims' descriptions of the majority of abusers as "Asian" men.
update:
陳雲 fb：
平機會通過種族歧視條例修訂之後，大陸人可以當街非禮香港女人，即使拉入後巷強姦，警察也不敢受理報案，因為怕捲入種族歧視法例。你以為不會發生？英國就發生了，而且情節令人髮指！英國警方由於擔心觸及種族歧視而惹麻煩，不敢拘捕強姦兒童的南亞族裔幫會。
一年前，我已經警告各位注意。
Wednesday, 20 August 2014
The joke of racial discrimination for a city with no sovereignty
(Extract of http://localpresshk.com/2014/08/no-sovereignty/
Translated and slightly modified)
... these international organizations, perhaps affected by reports of Richard Tsoi, Ho Hei-wah, Shi Lishan and the like, are often blind-sided when looking at the problem of new immigrants in Hong Kong. They always interpret it as discrimination commonly found in other countries where they are against foreign immigrants or people coming from certain regions; they do not realise that Hong Kong do not hold its own sovereignty, and those who are "discriminated" are really from a country that holds the sovereignty of Hong Kong (in other words they are the foot soldiers of the colonizing empire).
Perhaps because it never happened in history that colonial settlers could have even lower living standards than local inhabitants, these international organizations are unable or unwilling to understand that the so-called "immigration" is simply an act of a massive country colonizing a small city with inferior population.
Even more ridiculously, as the international community could never imagine that a regional autonomous government will take the initiative to suppress their own people to favour outsiders, they could not understand that it is the majority local residents who are the victims of discrimination. As the Hong Kong government does not hold its own sovereignty, it will only cater for the interest of its true sovereign holder (the colonizing China) and its 1.3 billion population, and take the lead in discriminating Hong Kong residents in education, immigration, tourism and other policies and suppress local interests.
Translated and slightly modified)
... these international organizations, perhaps affected by reports of Richard Tsoi, Ho Hei-wah, Shi Lishan and the like, are often blind-sided when looking at the problem of new immigrants in Hong Kong. They always interpret it as discrimination commonly found in other countries where they are against foreign immigrants or people coming from certain regions; they do not realise that Hong Kong do not hold its own sovereignty, and those who are "discriminated" are really from a country that holds the sovereignty of Hong Kong (in other words they are the foot soldiers of the colonizing empire).
Perhaps because it never happened in history that colonial settlers could have even lower living standards than local inhabitants, these international organizations are unable or unwilling to understand that the so-called "immigration" is simply an act of a massive country colonizing a small city with inferior population.
Even more ridiculously, as the international community could never imagine that a regional autonomous government will take the initiative to suppress their own people to favour outsiders, they could not understand that it is the majority local residents who are the victims of discrimination. As the Hong Kong government does not hold its own sovereignty, it will only cater for the interest of its true sovereign holder (the colonizing China) and its 1.3 billion population, and take the lead in discriminating Hong Kong residents in education, immigration, tourism and other policies and suppress local interests.
Tuesday, 6 May 2014
Hong Kong people discriminate against mainland Chinese? Quite the other way round...
If you have heard from mainstream western media that Hong Kong people are "Fascist" and discriminatory against mainland Chinese, well, quite the opposite, Hong Kong people are being discriminated, right in Hong Kong, by mainland Chinese!
The HK government (which obviously is just a puppet of the Chinese government), following their master's plan of colonising HK, is doing everything in their power to favour mainland Chinese and discriminates against local HK people here. Among many other things, they faithfully follow Hitler's saying of eradicating a culture by destroying the language, and destroying the language by starting at schools (see who is Fascist here?)
This article attempts to explain some recent incidents about the eradication of Cantonese, the preference of employing teachers from mainland and the public defaecation habit of mainland Chinese. You won't read these views in mainstream western media, both because of the mainland Chinese working inside them and because of leftist views very common among "highly educated" people.
The HK government (which obviously is just a puppet of the Chinese government), following their master's plan of colonising HK, is doing everything in their power to favour mainland Chinese and discriminates against local HK people here. Among many other things, they faithfully follow Hitler's saying of eradicating a culture by destroying the language, and destroying the language by starting at schools (see who is Fascist here?)
This article attempts to explain some recent incidents about the eradication of Cantonese, the preference of employing teachers from mainland and the public defaecation habit of mainland Chinese. You won't read these views in mainstream western media, both because of the mainland Chinese working inside them and because of leftist views very common among "highly educated" people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)