多謝燒山

本網也要多謝燒山，自Trump當選後，本網的流量大半都是來自燒山的條目！

左膠理論，世界通用

原來把「中共最開心」與「不要惹怒共產黨」交替使用的，不只是香港左膠的專利。

Hong Kong left-plastics often simultaneously use two contradictory arguments: "Don't-make-commies-happy" and "Don't-make-commies-angry". See the links for more details (in Chinese... one day I will write the English version...)

As it happens, those in the West are the same. Before Trump was elected, everyone accuses him of being friendly with Russia and China, and those countries will be most pleased to see a Trump win, and therefore it is wrong to vote for Trump. Now that Trump has called the Taiwanese president to anger China, the very same bunch of people come out to criticize him of provoking China.

(And of all the reasons not to support Trump, this one is the most ridiculous. Yes, he has said Putin-friendly things, but who are you, of all people, to accuse him of this? All the Russia aggression in Crimea, Syria, etc, happened under Obama, Clinton etc. What have you done about it, other than sounding fierce? Sanctions? Please. It is the western world's weakness that encouraged the Putin aggression.)

As another example of their double standards, when they lost the Brexit vote, they said it shouldn't count because even though the yes vote won 52:48, the turnout was only 70% or so, so the yes supporters were only 35% of the country and so "the majority did not vote for Brexit". And when they lose the US elections they then say that "we won the majority vote" (when the turnout was only around 50%).

再說古德明

(1) 古德明，熱血公民的大計
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/supplement/columnist/art/20160623/19665223

二零一零年，民主派也曾發起「五區公投」，也曾挾公投民意，呼籲「實行真普選，取消功能組別」，奈何中共充耳不聞。現在，黃毓民這邊廂痛詆民主派，那邊廂卻要師民主派故智，是一奇； ...

之前我還說古德明「對本土派的批評已不算猛烈」...唉。古德明嫉本土如仇，那也罷了，但也講點道理好不好？五區公投明明是黃毓民先發起，司徒華後來拒絕支持，最後只得公民黨參與，現在居然說成是「師民主派故智」？？

(2) 古德明經常在專欄攻擊陳雲、熱血等，說他們是共產黨派來，這個容易理解。不過他向來欣賞的公民黨，最近張德江「訪」港時，梁家傑等流晒口水醜態盡現，不知他又有何意見，怎麼好像不見其為文評論？

毒果中文

我曾經想過整個page將毒果報之共匪中文全部記錄下來，只是實在太多，根本不可能一一列舉。以下是昨天(20160330)其中兩例：

將推出一支內置10核CPU、內置6GB RAM及配備21MP Sony IMX230鏡頭的高階手機

手機也一支支，不如說一條好了。（得喇，台灣都係咁叫呀嗎）

就像facebook上以報道F1消息為主的「F1 Video」，剛釋出一條疑似內部訓練之用的VR眼罩

釋出片段已經不對，現在還釋出眼罩...

An article introducing "localism" at Hong Kong

'If you love China, you hate Hong Kong'
http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/if-you-love-china-you-hate-hong-kong

As far as English media is concerned, this is a reasonably accurate and less biased article...

---

On one level, it is about ring-fencing Hong Kong's identity and resources.

Says Dr Lee: "Localism is very strongly grounded in the differences between Hong Kongers and the 'invading' mainlanders'. Localists hate tolerance; they focus on Hong Kong's identity as a distinctive ethnic group, whose interests are being damaged."

Thus, for instance, rowdy localist protesters heckle mainland day-trippers as "locusts who deprive locals" of goods like formula milk. The entry of mainland immigrants, subject to a daily quota of 150, is also a festering issue. The mainland authorities decide who gets to come in.

Mr Lau underscores the unease, saying: "They are here, not just as tourists but residents, speaking putonghua (Mandarin). And you wonder, am I in Hong Kong or China?"

IT manager S. C. Lam, 40, says he supports localism. "We have lost too much to the Chinese - our economy, social welfare, our water. Traditional ways have not worked, so let's give localism a shot."

More importantly, by becoming a force in the political field, it forces the moderate pan-Democrats to "radicalise", says Mr Yau. "We will not get half (the support), but we can influence the centre."

Beijing's reaction to all this has been expectedly thunderous - it has branded the Mongkok rioters "separatists" - a label Mr Chow says he accepts "with honour".

Asked whether localism will simply cause Beijing to tighten its grip on Hong Kong, such as by ramming through an anti-subversion law, Mr Lau says: "It will happen anyway."

On the old-school pan-Democrats who have said they are Chinese patriots who "love China but hate the CCP", he says: "To us, if you love China, you hate Hong Kong."

Dr Lee says: "The degree of venom towards the pan-Democrats is even higher than towards the pro-Beijing establishment because localists see them as selling out."

【顧全大局 全民投 6 】

真正顧全大局的香港人，只有投 6 號梁天琦。

於 1997 年，中共在未經香港人授權下強行接管香港。多年來不斷違反一國兩制，除拒絕兌現真普選承諾外，更用每日 150 持單程證的大陸人溝淡香港本土人口，期間本港無權審批，並以雙非兒童、無上限自由行搶奪香港人福利及土地資源。

中共對香港施行兇殘的殖民政術，為消滅香港固有文化，勾結香港教育部門，推行大陸国民教育、普通話中文教學及残体字改造，毀我文教，毒害香江學子。

可惜香港的泛民主派為了一己私利，為了自身界別社福界及教育界的利益，不但沒有抵抗中共殖民惡行，更包庇大陸人來港侵吞香港人福利，包括於 2014 年聯署支持大陸人來港 1 年即可申領綜援 (21 位泛民議員)、爭取雙非兒童申領綜援 (張超雄)、鼓勵港中家庭團聚(蔡耀昌)、反對限奶令 (鄭家富)……

更甚者，面對一國兩制徹底崩壞，泛民政黨只顧每年行禮如儀般舉辦紀念六四活動，關心境外的民主中國多於民主香港。兩傘革命失敗，中共已經撕毀普選承諾，身為反對派的理應帶領香港人向前突破，與中共角力，重修基本法達至民主自治，如不果，當思考獨立建國之路。奈何泛民主派一直無法擺脫大家都是中國人的心魔，更只沿着過去三十年來的和平、理性、非武力的失敗舊路，否定一切勇武抗爭，甘心做一班維穩的偽反對派！

光復香港，時代革命。二月二十八日，為顧全大局，向中共殖民說不， 只有投 6 號 梁天琦。

(轉載自 2014 香港人醒覺)
https://www.facebook.com/hkwakeup/photos/a.361521623989357.1073741828.361448877329965/699862883488561/?type=3&theater

真．香港地

Rap is usually not my cup of tea, but this time it is an exception worth making.

「經過幾多清洗真港仔仍然係真港仔，見過幾多瘋狼真港人仍然係真港人」
「係真香港人，當然會識英雄輝」
「你一崇拜馬雲，就表示你係第二種人」
「I rap the police, I rap the government」

Hong Kong add oil! However difficult, we have to fight on!

Protest against US support of HK Copyright Amendment Bill

SocREC 社會記錄頻道 added 32 new photos to the album: 05JAN2016 14:00 要求夏千福勿再撐網絡廿三條（相片）
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1286104748083120.1073742161.160696287290644&type=3


Their slogans' English is a bit... never mind. Anyway, what is happening is that the HK government is proposing the copyright amendment bill. This will become an easy tool for the regime to suppress free speech and arrest political dissidents, because activists often use and distribute derived materials for satirical purposes. The most ridiculous part of the bill is that it allows the government to bypass the copyright holder to make criminal prosecutions against individuals, even if the copyright holder does not mind the use of their work.

The US government is supporting the bill for the commercial interests of US companies, and either is unaware of, or more likely, couldn't care less, about its political consequences. Seen in pictures are a "localist" political group ("HK-as-a-city-state") who have long advocated that the mainstream pro-democracy camp in HK are just working for the US, and not for HK people. This incident adds new evidence to this claim: those mainstream political parties pretend to be against the bill (so as to be seen on the side of free speech etc), but will do nothing other than sitting there and casting their votes, knowing full well that they don't have enough votes to stop the bill going through (due to the way the system is designed to prevent any real democracy.) Hence this localist group is protesting here directly to the US, appealing it to cease its support.